CLICK HERE FOR BLOGGER TEMPLATES AND MYSPACE LAYOUTS »

Final Opening Sequence

Final Opening Sequence

Preliminary Task

Preliminary Task

Tuesday, 19 October 2010

Media Prelim: Final Sequence


Group 1E Final Prelim Sequence - "I've Been Expecting You"

Media Prelim: Question 1

Who did you work with and how did you manage the task between you?

Photobucket
I was in group 1E (pictured above). In my group there were 4 people; Olivia, Narishma, Frank and myself. We each had at least one role in each of the three stages (Planning, Production and Editing)

During the planning, we all helped suggest ideas and storyboarded (Frank did the drawing). We worked well together to plan a final idea and to create a shot plan in chronological order of when we would shoot them.

During the production we each had our own roles:
Narishma - Director and Clapperboard Holder
Olivia - Camerawoman and Sound Director
Frank - Actor
Me - Actor

During the editing stage, we all took it in turns to edit the sequence (doing about a quarter each). However, we all helped each other with ideas about how we could order the sequence and improve the editing on the individual shots.

Media Prelim: Question 2

How did you plan your sequence? What processes did you use? What theories did you try to take into account?

When planning our sequence, we first wrote out a script on file paper, detailing our different shots, mise-en-scene and our dialogue. Using our script, we could then draw out a storyboard.
Originally, we drew our individual shots onto post-it notes so that we could move around the order of shots easily to achieve our final storyboard. Once that was achieved, we drew out our final storyboard onto the template to use during the shoot.
Finally, we planned our shot order based on the difficulty of our shots and the chronology of the individual shots. Doing this as a group made it easier and quicker, and once we had completed the shot order we were ready to shoot our sequence.
When planning our shots on the storyboard we took into account match-on-action (opening the doors), shot-reverse-shot (the conversation) and the 180 degree rule (throughout the sequence). When shooting and editing, we kept to these theories so our sequence made sense and didn't confuse the audience.

Our Draft Storyboard:
Our Final Storyboard (Extract):


























Our Shot List:

 

Our Shooting Schedule:
 

Our Script:

Media Prelim: Question 3

What technology did you use to complete the task, and how did you use it?

PhotobucketTo complete this task we used a range of technology.

When shooting the sequence, we used a Canon HD Video Recorder with a Shotgun Microphone attached to the top of it. We used headphones to hear the sound from the microphone whilst recording, so we could easily hear any background noise. We didn't use artificial lighting in our sequence, as
it wasn't necessary for the narrative of our sequence.

Photobucket
When editing the sequence, we used Adobe Premiere Pro to cut and order our sequences so that they flowed continuously without confusing our audience.

Media Prelim: Question 4

What factors did you have to take into account when planning, shooting and editing?

When planning, the main factor we had to take into account was the location of our sequence, as we had to choose a setting where we could fit the camera, tripod and both actors so that it didnt look cramped and so that we could fit everything into the shot. We eventually chose one of the edit suites in the Media Block, as it was long enough for the character entrance and we could fit all our equipment into the room easily. We also had to take into account the other groups, as they would be shooting in the same area and we had to make sure they weren't in the background of any of our shots.
When shooting and editing, we had to take into account background noise. We had to make sure that if there was any background noise in our shots that it wasn't too distracting and that it didn't suddenly cut our midway through an edited shot in our final sequence.

Media Prelim: Question 5

How successful was your sequence? Please identify what worked well, and with hindsight what you would improve, do differently?

Overall, I think our sequence was good. I think our editing was to a high standard and this worked well, as there was the match on action made the sequence flow and we kept to the 180 degree rule throughout the sequence. We also used shot distances in a logical order, so that the audience is taken over the physical space smoothly, rather than jumping about.
In hindsight, however, I would improve the scene where Frank spins around on the chair (pictured above) as the spin is only shown in one long shot. Originally, we had a close up of him spinning and then we cut back to the longer shot, but this didn't work with the match on action and it didn't appear to be very smooth. I would improve this scene by shooting with easier shots or by spending more time on the editing, which I couldn't do for this task. I would also take more shots for the establishing shot at the start, as the hand isn't at the same height when I open the door as in the next shot, so the continuity is wrong. By taking more shots, we could edit it better and find the correct shot to make it flow. 

Media Prelim: Question 6

What have you learnt from completing this task? Looking ahead, how will this learning be significant when completing the rest of your foundation coursework, do you think?

From this prelim task I have learnt a few things. Firstly, I have learnt about how effective match on action is when it comes to making the sequence flow continually. I have also learnt about the 180 degree rule, and how that is used so the audience isn't confused. Finally, I have learnt that to make it easier at the editing stage, you need to do lots of takes for each shot, so that match on action is easier to edit in. When editing our prelim task, we found it hard to match up all of the shots, as we didn't have enough takes for some shots. For the rest of my foundation coursework, I will try to get lots of takes for each shot, so that when it comes to editing, it will be easier to get match on action and for the sequence to flow continuously.

Monday, 11 October 2010

DYM HW feedback

Very good work, James.  Well done.  May be, you made things a bit more complicated re. Todorov by starting with a dream sequence, but your points were generally sound.

Saturday, 9 October 2010

Media Homework Barthes Five Codes


Forrest Gump Opening Sequence (Robert Zemeckis, 1994)

Enigma Codes: Who is the main character? Where are we as the audience focussing? Why are the man's shoes so muddy? Is he the protagonist or antagonist? What / Who is he waiting for? Why is yhe keeping the feather? Why does he have a suitcase and a box of chocolates with him? Where is he going?

Action Codes: The slight suspense in the opening of this sequence is caused by the flight of the feather, as you never know where it is going to end up until the end of the titles. It lands at the feet of a man on a bench. He picks it up and the audience doesn't know whether he is going to keep it or throw it away. He puts it in his suitcase, which then creates the suspense of what he's going to do with it later. Finally, at the end of the sequence, a bus draws up, and there is suspense as we wait and see if he gets on the bus or if someone he is waiting for gets off.

Semiotic Codes: There are a few semiotic codes in this sequence. Firstly, the skyline of the town which we see above the trees as the feather is flying suggests that the film is set in a rural town, rather than a large urban city. The man's shoes are also dirty and worn, which connotes that he is either poor or has a labour job. His white suit is an opposite however, as it is expensive and smart and is clean. The feather blowing in the wind also connotes the idea that the film may be about the story of a man who gets "blown" in different directions by events in his life.

Cultural Codes: There aren't many cultural codes in this sequence, but towards the end of the sequence the bus stop bench shows the audience that the man is waiting for a bus.

Symbolic Codes: Similar to the semiotic codes, the symbolic codes revolve around the mans clothes and the scrambled flight of the feather, implying that the man could be good or evil and that the film may be about his journey through life as his direction is changed by different events.

Tuesday, 5 October 2010

Media Homework Film Sequence (Continuity)


Casino Royale Construction Site Sequence (Extract) (Martin Campbell, 2006)

This short extract from the parkour sequence of Casino Royale has lots of different examples of continuity editing.
At the start of the clip we see a middle aged black male jump from a crane onto a roof before rolling onto the ground. There is instantly an example of continuity editing as there is a cross cut to a middle aged white male on the next crane. However, we cut straight to a MCU of the white male from an Establishing LS, which means the audience isn't taken across the space steadily.
It then cuts back to the black male jumping off the rooftop, hitting the ground and rolling. This sequence of actions takes place over 3 different shots. There is good use matched cuts and match on action between these shots as the action flows smoothly, as it would in real life.
It then cuts back up to the white male, who looks at the rooftop again before jumping off of the crane. The action here also takes place over numerous shots, but because of good continuity editing the action flows smoothly. Also, when the white male jumps it cuts back to the Establishing LS. This shows the audience how far the gap between the cranes is and gives them a sense of position.
As the white male lands, it cuts to a MS of him clinging to the edge of the crane . It then cuts to a CU of him clambering back up to jump from the second crane onto the roof. This use of shot order steadily takes the audience across the space with the character and gets them involved in the action more. This is also helped by the match on action between shots.
We then get a seqeunce of cross cut shots, which imply that the action we can see from the separate characters is happening simultaneously, as it is a chase scene. These shots have been edited in parallel with one another, and eventually the two characters meet up again, as implied by the cross cutting.
The sequence then cuts to a quick cutaway shot of the lift shaft, where the black male jumps across and then back again to the next floor. It then cross cuts back to the white male sliding down a hole in the floor onto the lower level, and the sequence flows smoothly with the right use of matched cuts and match on action.
After more cross cutting between characters, to show the audience that it is a chase scene and the action is taking place simultaneously, we get another Establishing LS of the exterior of the site, showing that the characters have now moved to another location. The balck male jumps from the building onto a blue lift and down. This is shot in 3 shots once again, which gradually take the audience closer to the character. It cuts back up to a MS of the white male in the building, before cutting to a POV shot of the balck male jumping down. The POV then pans over to the lift controls, which implies to the audience that the white male will use the lift.
There is then a LA shot featuring both men jumping, and this is a good continuity shot as it is a matched cut. This is the final shot in this sequence, and the match on action shows that the black male has got down the builiding in a realistic time, compared with how fast the white male went across the space.

This sequence uses a wide range of continuity editing techniques to a good standard, to realistically show the audience the action as it is happening and the cross cutting also shows the two characters are running simultaneously to one another.

Sunday, 3 October 2010

Media Homework Levi-Strauss' Theory


This is the Opening to Casino Royale (Martin Campbell, 2006)

1. The genre of the film is action, and there are many signifiers which are introduced in this opening sequence. Firstly, the tranisitons between shots are cuts, which show that the action is fast paced. Also, there is a chase and a fight scene in a public location, which also signifies the genre is action. The signifiers are introduced near the beginning of the opening, so the genre is established early on.

2. There are three main characters in this sequence. They are all opposed in different ways. The main protagonist is a white male with short blonde hair in his 30s wearing a dark suit. The second main character, the antagonist, is a Pakistani male with curly black hair in his 20s in a casual shirt. The third main character is an old white male with short grey hair in a dark coat. There are binary opposites with all the characters, which shows the audience that they are going to fight each other at some point.

3. The main theme of the film is for the protagonist, Bond, to earn his "Double O" status. In the opening scene this is explained as he needs to kill two people. The first kill is shown in a flashback, which involves a fight scene in a bathroom of a cricket ground. The second kill comes at the end of the opening, when he shoots the man in the office. The main themes of the film are not yet introduced, which leaves the audience in the unknown about what will happen.

4. The narrative shows conflict as there are many binary opposites between the characters. The protagonist is in a suit, whereas the antagonist is wearing a casual shirt. They also look different, as the protagonist is a British male with short blonde hair and the antagonist is a Pakistani male with long curly hair. The other main character in the office also has conflict with the protagonist, and this is shown as he tries to shoot the protagonist at one point, but doesnt have any bullets. It is also shown as he wears dark coat and hat and is considerably older, more binary opposites which imply there is conflict.

Saturday, 2 October 2010

Media Homework Todorov's Theory


This is the opening scene from The Naked Gun 33⅓ (Peter Segal, 1994)

1. The Protaganist: Lt. Frank Drebin - Elderly man in a grey suit who is the main focus of the establishing shot
The Antagonist: Villain - Middle aged man in dark coat and hat who starts a shootout with the protaganist.

2. At the start of the sequence, the establishing shot shows a nearly deserted train station which is peaceful. This is the equilibrium shown at the start of the film. The Close ups also show the protaganist and the clock, which gives particular focus on the fact that the genre may be partly action. The fact that the protaganists suit is a light colour also implies that he is a good guy, as the contrast of light and dark soon follows.

3. There is a short disequilibrium in the opening sequence which is shown when the villain enters in his dark coat with his "gang". This then ends up in a shootout, which breaks the quiet state of the train station. Later on at the end of the sequence, we find out that it is a dream and that the protaganist is a retired detective. This implies that there will be a disruption that will cause him to come out of retirement to help out.

4. At the end of the clip there are clues that the journey will involve stopping some sort of criminal activity. The dream of the shootout in the train station also implies this, as the protaganist is "overwhelmed" by the amount of crime

5. At the end of the film, the bomb is stopped and the criminal is captured. The new equilibrium is similar to the old equilibrium, as the detective retires again and all is back to normal.

Media Homework Continuity

Why is Continuity so important?

Continuity in films is very important as, if used incorrectly, it can confuse the audience. The ultimeat aim of the director of a film isto encourage the audience to "enter" the world of the film. By using continuity technques correctly, the audience can "absorb" the film.

Continuity Editing Techniques

Here are some techniques used in editing to keep continuity in the film:

  • 180° rule - to reduce confusion of the position of a character in relation to their surroundings in a film by only filming on one side of an imaginary 180° line.
  • 30° rule - moving the camera betweeen set ups to avoid "jumps" in a scene
  • Use of shot distances - in order to take the audience smoothly through the narrative, certain distances are routinely edited together (Long Shot - Mid Shot - Close Up or vice versa).
  • Use of transitions - some transitions (such as dissolves and fades) can be used to signify a change over time, whereas others (such as cuts) can be used to show the scene is moving at a fast pace.
  • Eyeline matching - Matching the height of the eyeline between two characters or out of the frame. 
  • Matched Cut - the edit matches the action in the previous one
  • Match on action - the last action in the previous shot matches exactly to the first action in the next shot.
  • Shot-reverse-shot - cutting back and forward between two characters having a conversation, so the audience are literally placed in the action
  • Cross cutting - shots are placed together to show that they are happening simultaneously, even though they actually belong to different spaces in the narrative
For my own films in the future, I will try to incorporate all of these editing techniques to ensure that my film is perfect continuity wise. Unless it is needed for the narrative of the film, I will try to avoid confusing the audience by misusing the 180° and 30° rules.